The Answer Is Yes.

For anyone still wondering - yes. A photo of the object itself exists. 

I haven't published it. Yet.

I shouldn't have to prove this ever happened. But I can. And I will -  if silence continues to be their only response.

--K 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This Is How They Responded

Not long after I raised this serious concern, I was called into a Google meeting with my direct supervisor and a high-ranking administrator.  But the issue I had flagged? They didn't even mention it.  I had to bring it up myself- calmly, professionally. They showed no intention of addressing it. Instead, the conversation quickly turned towards me. I was told that I appeared "unempathetic" and "unapproachable"- not to them, but to my students. No names. No specific examples. Just a vague criticism, dropped like a warning. I responded clearly, "My students reviews speak for themselves "  And in that moment, they backed off. The tone shifted. The accusation didn't hold- because it couldn't.  When I attempted to explain what had been happening with the two students in question- facts I had written down- they interrupted me. I wasn't angry or emotional. I was prepared. They didn't want to hear it. My supervisor then added something else: tha...
Read more

Friendly Reminder: Social Media

Friendly reminder: I only accept friend requests from people I know, trust, and actually like. So if you're an old coworker, former HR rep, or anyone who treated me like garbage on my way out the door- don't flatter yourself.  If you suddenly remembered I exist after I started blogging about retaliation, lawsuits, or federal violations...  don't worry, I noticed that timing too. Digital footprints are a lot louder than you think. -- K 
Read more

They Thought a Denial Would Shut Me Up. Wrong Move.

Image
After six weeks of certifying and unsuccessfully calling the Department of Labor nearly every day to try to speak to an actual person - sometimes multiple times a day - I finally got their decision. And let me tell you, it reads like it was written in crayon. Here’s exactly what they said:  “You are disqualified under Section 593.1 of the Unemployment Insurance Law because  you quit your job without good cause.” Then they doubled down with this insulting explanation: “You quit due to dissatisfaction with the actions of your employer. Although you state you  were forced to resign, the available information shows that your separation from  employment was voluntary and you have not shown that you had a compelling reason for  resigning.” That’s it. No reference to the hostile environment. No mention of the retaliation. No acknowledgment that I submitted a paper trail, formal complaints, timelines, witness names, and photographic evidence. No mention that I was ghos...
Read more